Abstract
Background
In recent years long-term discomfort after inguinal hernia surgery has become an issue of great concern to hernia surgeons. Long-term results on discomfort from large randomised studies are sparse.
Methods
One-thousand one-hundred and eighty-three patients were randomised in a multicentre trial with the primary aim of comparing recurrence rates after laparoscopic TAPP and Shouldice repair. Evaluating late discomfort and its possible risk factors were secondary objectives, and are reported here. The patients were clinically examined after 1 and 5 years, and answered questionnaires 2 and 3 years postoperation.
Results
Of 1,068 operated patients, 867 were eligible for analysis after 5 years (81.2%). The percentage of patients experiencing discomfort of any kind were 8.5% in the TAPP group and 11.4% (p = 0.156) in the Shouldice group. Although discomfort was usually mild it was severe for 0.2 and 0.7%, respectively. Severe pain the first postoperative week was a risk factor for late discomfort in the Shouldice group (OR 2.25, P = 0.022) but not in the TAPP group. No other risk factor for late discomfort was found.
Conclusion
There was no difference between late discomfort at five-year follow-up after laparoscopic TAPP and Shouldice repair. Discomfort was mostly mild and pain during the first postoperative week was a prognostic variable for late discomfort in Shouldice patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Welsh DRJ, Alexander MAJ (1993) The shouldice repair. Surg Clin North Am 73:451–469
Devlin HB, Gillen PHA, Waxman BP, MacNay RA (1986) Short stay surgery for inguinal hernia: experience of the shouldice operation, 1970–1982. Br J Surg 73:123–124
McGillicuddy JE (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of the shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 133:974–978
Danielsson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV (1999) Randomized study of Lichtenstein compared with shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg 165:49–53
Tran VK, Pütz T, Rohde H (1992) A randomized controlled trial for inguinal hernia repair to compare the Shouldice and the Bassini–Kirschner operation. Int Surg 77:235–237
Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PMNYH, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1997) Longterm follow up (12–15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini–Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 185:365–370
Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G (2002) Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49
Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy—a personal experience with 6,321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1994) A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Int Surg 79:76–79
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension-free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 114:3–8
Kugel RD (2003) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178:298–302
Arregui ME, Navarrete J, Davis CJ, Castro D, Nagan RF (1993) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: techniques and controversies. Surg Clin North Am 73:513–527
Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:316–319
Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. BMJ 311:981–985
Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ 317:103–110
Liem MSL, Van Der Graaf Y, Van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547
Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H (2004) Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect hernia in young males. Br J Surg 91:1372–1376
Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531
Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study: pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602
McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM and the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1)CD001785
Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt C-G (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615
Schmedt C-G, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open-mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199
Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow-up. BMJ 326:1012–1013
Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, on behalf of the MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574
Liem MSL, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJMV, on behalf of the Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141
Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, Strobbe LJA, Rosman C (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene® hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38
Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander L-K, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomised multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6:56–61
Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimback G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091
Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114:1–2
Swedish hernia register 2004. http://www.svensktbrackregister.se/pdf/red04.pdf
Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Kingsnorth A (2002) Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain—a call for uniform assessment. Hernia 6:178–181
Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E. Recurrence, pain three years after groin hernia repair (2002) Validation of postal questionnaire and selected physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28
Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, Öttinger AP, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63:129–136
Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (1998) Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials 19:2235–2246
O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170
Bringman S, Wollert S, Österberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Fellander G, Heikkinen T (2005) One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II- mesh in Lichtenstein herniaplasty. Hernia 9:223–227
Topart P, Vanden broucke P, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel vs tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc 19:724–727
Schwab R, Willms A, Kroger A, Becker HP (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277
Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. A randomised prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675
Moreno-Egea A, Martinez JAT, Cuenca GM, Albasini JLA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Surg 139:1376–1379
Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A et al (2006) Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295:285–292
Acknowledgments
Other surgeons participating in this trial: Per Almqvist, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Malmö, Magnus Bergenfeldt, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Malmö, Ib Rasmussen, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Eva Lundgren, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Jan Antonsson, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Ingrid Svedberg, S:t Görans sjukhus, Stockholm, Jon Ahlberg, S:t Görans Sjukshus, Stockholm, Lena Blomgren, S:t Görans sjukhus, Stockholm, Anders Hellberg, Centrallasarettet Västerås, Bo Sjögren, Centrallasarettet Västerås, Gunnar Wickbom, Regionsjukhuset Örebro, Lars-Erik Larsson, Regionsjukhuset Örebro, Erik Jörtsö, Regionsjukhuset Örebro, Göran Ågren, Regionsjukhuset Örebro, Gunnar Rimbäck, Mölndal lasarett, U. Wingren, Mölndal lasarett, LarsGöran Ekman, Mölndal lasarett, Olle Thorén, Mölndal lasarett, Leif Spangen, Karlstad lasarett, L-K Enander, Karlstad lasarett. Financial support: Ethicon EndoSurgery, Johnson and Johnson Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berndsen, F.H., Petersson, U., Arvidsson, D. et al. Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group. Hernia 11, 307–313 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0214-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0214-7