Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to describe the technique of laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced robotic surgical system.

Methods

Eleven patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Four trocars were used: one for the camera, two for the robotic arms controlled by the operating surgeon from the surgeon’s console, and an additional port for use by the surgical assistant.

Results

Ages ranged from 27 to 77 years, and weight ranged from 54 to 100 kg. Operative time ranged from 4.5 to 10 hours. Estimated blood loss ranged from 50 to 1500 ml. The patients tolerated the procedure and recovered satisfactorily.

Conclusion

This is the first case series reporting the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robot for performing hysterectomy in humans. It is feasible and well tolerated in this series of patients. As this technology develops, the applications for its use in gynecology and gynecologic oncology will increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Intern 87: 408–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PR, Cadiere GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74: 1020–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L (2000) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 73: 1040–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kappert U, Cichon R, Schneider J, Gulielmos V, Ahmadzade T, Nicolai J, et al (2001) Technique of closed chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20: 765–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW (1997) Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 158: 1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Margossian H, Falcone T (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques 11: 161–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mettler l, Ibrahim M, Jonat W (1998) One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaeocological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprrd 13: 2748–2750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL (2000) The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gyn Laparosc 7: 9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1995) Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 181: 552–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reich H, Decaprio J, McGlynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 5: 213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 27 June 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diaz-Arrastia, C., Jurnalov, C., Gomez, G. et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16, 1271–1273 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5

Key words

Navigation