Elsevier

Pathology

Volume 27, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 172-176
Pathology

The MicroScan WalkAway diagnostic microbiology system — an evaluation

https://doi.org/10.1080/00313029500169822Get rights and content

Summary

The MicroScan WalkAway is an automated bacterial identification and susceptibility testing system that has only recently been marketed in Australasia.

We evaluated the performance of the instrument using MicroScan Rapid fluorescent panels to determine the identity and antibiotic susceptibilities of 100 Gram negative and 100 Gram positive organisms representing both common clinical isolates and selected organisms of interest.

MicroScan results were compared with those obtained by conventional biochemical identification, and antibiotic susceptibility testing using agar dilution following the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines.

MicroScan and reference identifications were in agreement for 93% of Gram negative organisms. MicroScan results were available within 2 hrs. Additional tests were required to confirm the identity of 9 isolates but on only 2 occasions would a definitive identification been delayed beyond 24 hrs. Very major or major discrepancies were seen in 2% and minor discrepancies in 8% of Gram negative susceptibility tests. Susceptibility results were available within 7 hrs but could not be obtained for 13 slow growing organisms.

With Gram positive organisms MicroScan agreed with the reference identification of 87% of isolates cultured on horse and 90% of those cultured on sheep blood agar. Discrepancies that occurred in the identification of some streptococci made us question the suitability of MicroScan as the sole means of identifying these organisms. All identifications were available within 24 hrs and the requirement for additional tests was minimal. Susceptibility results closely matched those obtained by agar dilution with < 1% major and 7% and 9% minor discrepancies occurring with sheep and horse blood respectively.

Rapid fluorescent panels procesed by the MicroScan WalkAway system provide quick and accurate identification and susceptibility results for a wide range of aerobic bacteria.

References (10)

  • M.K. York et al.

    Evaluation of the autoscan W/A rapid system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram negative fermentative bacilli

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1992)
  • G.L. Barrow et al.

    Cowan & Steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria

    (1993)
  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically

    Approved Standard M7-A2

    (1990)
  • M. Visser et al.

    Comparison of autoscan W/A and Vitek automicrobic systems for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria

    Euro J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (1992)
  • L. Stoakes et al.

    Evaluation of Microscan Rapid Pos combo panels for identification of staphylococci

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1992)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (38)

  • Identification and culture test

    2023, Antiviral and Antimicrobial Smart Coatings: Fundamentals and Applications
  • Achromobacter xylosoxidans infection in an adult cystic fibrosis unit in Madrid

    2016, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the rest of the patients it was not possible to perform the confirmation by sequencing. These procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations.16 Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution (MicroScan WalkAway, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., West Sacramento, California, USA).

  • Burkholderia cepacia complex infection in an Adult Cystic Fibrosis unit in Madrid

    2013, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
    Citation Excerpt :

    Molecular size markers were included on all gels: Marker X 0.07–12.2 kbp (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany) and GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) for 16s rDNA and recA products, respectively. Strains identified as B. cenocepacia were subjected to PCR method with specific primers for RecA-IIIA group (BCRG3A1 and BCRG3A2) and RecA-IIIB (BCRG3B1 and BCRG3B2) under conditions previously described.24 Ten μl of PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis at the same conditions described above.

  • Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of ocular bacterial flora in patients undergoing intravitreal injections

    2010, Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another potential limitation of the study was our use of 2 different antibiotic susceptibility testing methods. However, similar susceptibility profiles were obtained using each modality, and their high correlation to standardized agar dilution methods has been previously confirmed.33–35 Additionally, because 1 method was used in the first half of the study and the other method in the latter half, there should be no systematic bias regarding patient selection or results.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text