The MicroScan WalkAway diagnostic microbiology system — an evaluation
References (10)
- et al.
Evaluation of the autoscan W/A rapid system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram negative fermentative bacilli
J Clin Microbiol
(1992) - et al.
Cowan & Steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria
(1993) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically
Approved Standard M7-A2
(1990)- et al.
Comparison of autoscan W/A and Vitek automicrobic systems for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria
Euro J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
(1992) - et al.
Evaluation of Microscan Rapid Pos combo panels for identification of staphylococci
J Clin Microbiol
(1992)
Cited by (38)
Identification and culture test
2023, Antiviral and Antimicrobial Smart Coatings: Fundamentals and ApplicationsMini-review: Recent advances in imaging-based rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing
2021, Sensors and Actuators ReportsAchromobacter xylosoxidans infection in an adult cystic fibrosis unit in Madrid
2016, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia ClinicaCitation Excerpt :In the rest of the patients it was not possible to perform the confirmation by sequencing. These procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations.16 Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution (MicroScan WalkAway, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., West Sacramento, California, USA).
Burkholderia cepacia complex infection in an Adult Cystic Fibrosis unit in Madrid
2013, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia ClinicaCitation Excerpt :Molecular size markers were included on all gels: Marker X 0.07–12.2 kbp (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany) and GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) for 16s rDNA and recA products, respectively. Strains identified as B. cenocepacia were subjected to PCR method with specific primers for RecA-IIIA group (BCRG3A1 and BCRG3A2) and RecA-IIIB (BCRG3B1 and BCRG3B2) under conditions previously described.24 Ten μl of PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis at the same conditions described above.
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of ocular bacterial flora in patients undergoing intravitreal injections
2010, OphthalmologyCitation Excerpt :Another potential limitation of the study was our use of 2 different antibiotic susceptibility testing methods. However, similar susceptibility profiles were obtained using each modality, and their high correlation to standardized agar dilution methods has been previously confirmed.33–35 Additionally, because 1 method was used in the first half of the study and the other method in the latter half, there should be no systematic bias regarding patient selection or results.
Evaluation of the BD Phoenix SMIC/ID, a new streptococci identification and antimicrobial susceptibility panel, for potential routine use in a university-based clinical microbiology laboratory
2005, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease