Mechanisms of Biliary Stent Clogging: Confocal Laser Scanning and Scanning Electron Microscopy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic insertion of plastic biliary endoprostheses is a well-established treatment for obstructive jaundice. The major limitation of this technique is late stent occlusion. In order to compare events involved in biliary stent clogging and identify the distribution of bacteria in unblocked stents, confocal laser scanning (CLS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were carried out on two different stent materials - polyethylene (PE) and hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane (HCPC).
Patients and Methods: Ten consecutive patients with postoperative benign biliary strictures were included in the study. Two 10-Fr stents 9 cm in length, one made of PE and the other of HCPC, were inserted. The stents were electively exchanged after 3 months and examined using CLS and SEM.
Results: No differences were seen between the two types of stent. The inner stent surface was covered with a uniform amorphous layer. On top of this layer, a biofilm of living and dead bacteria was found, which in most cases was unstructured. The lumen was filled with free-floating colonies of bacteria and crystals, surrounded by mobile laminar structures of mucus. An open network of large dietary fibers was seen in all of the stents.
Conclusions: The same clogging events occurred in both PE and HCPC stents. The most remarkable observation was the identification of networks of large dietary fibers, resulting from duodenal reflux, acting as a filter. The build-up of this intraluminal framework of dietary fibers appears to be a major factor contributing to the multifactorial process of stent clogging.

References

• 1 Huibregtse K, Tytgat G N. Palliative treatment of obstructive jaundice by transpapillary introduction of large bore bile duct endoprosthesis.  Gut. 1982;  23 371-375
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Davids P H, Groen A K, Rauws E A. et al . Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.  Lancet. 1992;  340 1488-1492
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Groen A K, Out T, Huibregtse K. et al . Characterization of the content of occluded biliary endoprostheses.  Endoscopy. 1987;  19 57-59
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Sung J Y, Leung J W, Shaffer E A. et al . Bacterial biofilm, brown pigment stone and blockage of biliary stents.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1993;  8 28-34
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Coene P P, Groen A K, Cheng J. et al . Clogging of biliary endoprostheses: a new perspective.  Gut. 1990;  31 913-917
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Leung J W, Ling T K, Kung J L, Vallance-Owen J. The role of bacteria in the blockage of biliary stents.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  34 19-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Speer A G, Cotton P B, Rode J. et al . Biliary stent blockage with bacterial biofilm: a light and electron microscopy study.  Ann Intern Med. 1988;  108 546-553
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 McAllister E W, Carey L C, Brady P G. et al . The role of polymeric surface smoothness of biliary stents in bacterial adherence, biofilm deposition, and stent occlusion.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 422-425
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Dowidar N, Kolmos H J, Matzen P. Experimental clogging of biliary endoprostheses: role of bacteria, endoprosthesis material, and design.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;  27 77-80
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Jansen B, Goodman L P, Ruiten D. Bacterial adherence to hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane stents.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 670-673
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Binmoeller K F, Seitz U, Seifert H. et al . The Tannenbaum stent: a new plastic biliary stent without side holes.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 1764-1768
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Van Berkel A M, Boland C, Redekop W K. et al . A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 681-686
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Rotondano G. et al . Hydrophilic Hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 8-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Van Berkel A M, Bruno M J, Bergman J J. et al . A prospective randomized study of hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane versus polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 478-482
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Lawrence J R, Neu T R, Swerhone G DW. Application of multiple parameter imaging for the quantification of algal, bacterial and exopolymer components of microbial biofilms.  J Microbiol Methods. 1998;  32 253-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sung J J, Sollano J D, Lai C W. et al . Long-term ciprofloxacin treatment for the prevention of biliary stent blockage: a prospective randomized study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 3197-3201
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Weickert U, Venzke T, Konig J. et al . Why do bilioduodenal plastic stents become occluded. A clinical and pathological investigation on 100 consecutive patients?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 786-790
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar

M. Bruno, M. D., Ph. D.

Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2 - 220

Academic Medical Center · Meibergdreef 9 · 1105 AZ Amsterdam · The Netherlands

Fax: +31-20-6917033

Email: m.j.bruno@amc.uva.nl