Skip to main content
Log in

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Design as a Prevention Strategy. A Review

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are of serious concern to many organizations, including industry, insurance, and health care. They are also of immediate concern to the workers and their families who are adversely affected by these disorders. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a substantial source of economic drain to these organizations. Sources of this drain include economic losses incurred from lost or decreased productivity as well as medical treatment and indemnity costs. Therefore, it is within the best interest of these organizations to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders from occurring, before they manifest into serious issues of medical, social, and economic concern. The purpose of this paper is to review the concept of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and discuss the basis of their prevention as a primary means of occupational injury and illness management. The principal contributory role of ergonomics/human factors is presented as a viable means of prevention and an important contributor to the comprehensive management of these disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP. Musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberta Human Resources and Employment. Occupational injuries and disease in Alberta 1999 summary. Edmonton, AB: Performance and Applied Research Alberta Human Resources and Employment, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Workers' Compensation Board-Alberta. Workers' Compensation Board-Alberta 1999 annual report. Edmonton, AB: Workers' Compensation Board-Alberta, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Workers' Compensation Board-Alberta. Workers' Compensation Board-Alberta 1998 annual report. Edmonton, AB: Workers' Compensation Board-Alberta, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Human Resources and Development Canada. Work safely for a healthy future.Statistical analysis occupational injuries and fatalities Canada. Research and Analysis, Occupational Safety and Health and Fire Prevention Division, Operations Directorate, Labour, Human Resources and Development Canada. Ottawa, ON, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pransky G, Snyder T, Dembe A, Himmelstein J. Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: A case study and review of literature. Ergonomics 1999; 42(1): 171-182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Courtney TK, Burdorf A, Sorock GS, Herrick RF. Methodological challenges to the study of occupational injury: An international study workshop. Am J Ind Med 1997; 32: 103-105.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sorock GS, Smith E, Hall N. An evaluation of New Jersey's hospital discharge database for surveillance of sever occupational injuries. Am J Ind Med 1993; 23: 427-437.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wigglesworth EC. Serious occupational injuries in Australia: Some deficiencies of the existing data collections. Community Health Stud 1990; 14(3): 279-287.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenman KD, Gardiner JC, Wang J, Biddle J, Hogan A, Reilly MJ, Roberts K, Welch E. Why most workers with occupational repetitive trauma do not file workers' compensation. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42(1): 25-34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biddle J, Roberts K, Rosenman KD, Welch EM. What percentage of workers with work related illnesses receive worker's compensation benefits? J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40(4): 325-331.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riihimäki H. Back and limb disorders. In: McDonald C, ed. Epidemiology of work related diseases. London, U.K.: BMJ Publishing, 1995, pp. 207-239.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cockburn IM, Bailit HL, Berndt ER, Finkelstein SN. Loss of work productivity due to illness and medical treatment. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41(11): 948-953.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burton WN, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Schultz AB, Edington DW. The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41(10): 863-877.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feuerstein M, Berkowitz SM, Huang GD. Predictors of occupational low back disability: Implications for secondary prevention. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41(12): 1024-1031.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore SJ. Office ergonomics programs: A case study of North American Corporations. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39(12): 1203-1211.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Volinn E. Do workplace interventions prevent low-back disorders? If so, why?: A methodologic commentary. Ergonomics 1999; 42(1): 258-272.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melhorn JM, Wilkinson L, Gardner P, Horst WD, Silkey B. An outcome study of an occupational medicine intervention program for the reduction of musculoskeletal disorders and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41(10): 833-846.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lincoln AE, Vernick JS, Ogaitis S, Smith GS, Mitchell CL, Agnew J. Interventions for the primary prevention of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18(4S): 37-50.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA, Schaefer JA, Lavin RA, Tsai SP. An ergonomics program designed to reduce the incidence of upper extremity work related musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41(12): 1032-1041.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brisson C, Montreiuil S, Punnet L. Effects of an ergonomic training program on workers with video display units. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25(3): 255-263.

    Google Scholar 

  22. United States General Accounting Office. Report to congressional requesters. In: Worker protection: Private sector ergonomics programs yield positive results, GAO/HEHE-97-163. 1997.

  23. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97B B141. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997.

  24. National Research Council. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Research Council. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Report, workshop summary, and workshop papers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization. Identification and control of work-related diseases, Report Series 714. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Putz-Anderson V. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A manual for musculoskeletal diseases of the upper limbs. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hagberg M, Silverstein B, Wells R, Smith MJ, Hendrick HW, Carayon P, Pérusse M. Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs): A reference book for prevention. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moon SD, Sauter SL, eds. Beyond biomechanics: Psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorder disorders in office work. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moore A, Wells R, Ranney D. Quantifying exposure in occupational manual tasks with work-related musculoskeletal disorder potential. Ergonomics 1991; 34(12): 1433-1453.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rowe M. The diagnosis of tendon and tendon sheath injuries. Semin Occup Med 1987; 2(1): 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wells R, Keir P. Work and activity-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. In: Kumar S, ed. Biomechanics in ergonomics. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 1999, pp. 165-177.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wall E, Massie J, Kwan M, Rydevik B, Myers R, Garfin S. Experimental stretch neuropathy. Changes in nerve conduction under tension. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74(1): 126-129.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Muggleton JM, Allen R, Chappell PH. Hand and arm injuries associated with repetitive manual work in industry: A review of disorders, risk factors and preventative measures. Ergonomics 1999; 42(5): 714-739.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Hand wrist work-related musculoskeletal disorders in industry. Br J Ind Med 1986; 43: 779-784.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Silverstein MA, Silverstein BA, Franklin GM. Evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A scientific counterargument. J Occup Environ Med 1996; 38(5): 477-484.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity: A prevention strategy is needed. J Occup Med 1991; 33(5): 642-644.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Keyserling WM. Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 1: A review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with low back pain. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2000a; 61: 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Keyserling WM. Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 1: A review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with upper extremity disorders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2000b; 61: 231-243.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Erdil M, Dickerson OB, eds. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders.Prevention, evaluation and treatment. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Parenmark G, Engvall B, Malmkvist E. Ergonomic on-the-job training of assemblyworkers. Appl Ergonomics 1988; 19: 143-146.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Oxenburgh M. Repetition strain injury in keyboard operators. J Occup Health and Safety Aust N Z 1985; 1(12): 106-112.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Westgaard RH, Aaras A. The effects of improved workplace design on the development of work-related musculoskeletal illness. Appl Ergonomics 1985; 16: 91-97.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Armstrong TJ, Castelli WA, Gaynor Evans F, Dias-Perez R. Some histological changes in the carpal tunnel contents and their biomechanical implications. J Occup Med 1984; 26(3): 197-201.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goldstein SA, Armstrong TJ, Chaffin DB, Matthews LS. Analysis of cumulative strain in tendons and tendon sheaths. J Biomech 1987; 20(1): 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Armstrong TJ. Ergonomics and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Hand Clin 1986; 2(3): 553-565.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Armstrong TJ, Fine LJ, Goldstein SA. Ergonomic considerations in hand and wrist tendonitis. Hand Surg 1987; 12(5, Part 2): 830-837.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rempel DM, Harrison RJ, Barnhart S. Work related work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 267(6): 838-842.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stock S. Workplace ergonomic factors and the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limbs: A meta-analysis. Am J Ind Med 1991; 19: 87-107.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Viikari-Juntura E. The scientific basis for making guidelines and standards to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Ergonomics 1997; 40: 1097-1117.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kumar S. Cumulative load as a risk factor for back pain. Spine 1990; 15(12): 1311-1316.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hadler NM. Occupational illness: The issue of causality. J Occup Med 1984; 26: 587-593.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hadler NM. Industrial rheumatology: The Australian and NewZealand experience with arm pain and backache in the workplace. Med J Aust 1986; 144: 191-195.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hadler NM. The roles of work and of working in disorders of upper extremity. Baillieress Clin Rheumatol 1989; 3: 121-141.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hadler NM. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: An iatrogenic concept. J Occup Med 1990; 32(1): 38-41.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hadler NM. Arm pain in the workplace: A small area analysis. J Occup Med 1992; 34(2): 113-119.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ireland DC. Review article: Psychological and physical aspects of occupational arm pain. J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13: 5-10.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ireland DC. Repetitive strain injury: The Australian experience-1992 update. J Hand Surg [Am] 1995; 20A(3, Part 2): S53-S56.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nathan PA, Meadows KD, Doyle LS. Occupation as a risk factor for impaired sensoryconduction of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel. J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13B(2): 167-170.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nathan PA, Meadows KD, Doyle LS. The relationship of age and sex to sensory conduction of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel and association of slowed conduction with symptoms. Muscle Nerve 1988; 11: 1149-1153.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nathan PA, Keniston RC. Carpal tunnel syndrome and its relation to general physical condition. Hand Clin 1993; 9(2): 253-261.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ferguson DA. RSI: Putting the epidemic to rest. Med J Aust 1987; 147: 213-214.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cleland LG. RSI: A model for social iatrogenesis. Med J Aust 1987; 147: 236-239.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hocking B. Epidemiological aspects of 'repetition strain injury' in Telecom Australia. Med J Aust 1987; 147: 218-222.

    Google Scholar 

  65. McDermott FT. Repetition strain injury: A review of current understanding. Med J Aust 1996; 144: 196-200.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wright GD. The failure of the 'RSI' concept. Med J Aust 1987; 147: 233-236.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gerr F, Letz R. Risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome in industry: Blaming the victim? J Occup Med 1992; 34(11): 117-118.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Boden LI. Workers' compensation in the United States: High costs, low benefits. Annu Rev Public Health 1995; 16: 189-218.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rey P, Bousquet A. Compensation for occupational injuries and disease: Its effect upon prevention in the workplace. Ergonomics 1995; 38(3): 475-486.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Viikari-Juntura E, Riihimaki H. New avenues in research on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand JWork Environ Health 1999; 25(6): 564-568.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nelson RM. Prevention-a government perspective. Ergonomics 1987; 30(2): 221-226.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Romer CJ. The importance of accident and injury prevention. Ergonomics 1987; 30(2): 173-179.

    Google Scholar 

  73. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. A national strategy for occupational musculoskeletal injuries: Implementation issues and research needs, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 93-101. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1993.

  74. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National occupational research agenda, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-115. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.

  75. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National occupational research agenda.Update May 1999.21 priorities for the 21st century. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, DHHS (NIOSH), 1999.

  76. Hensrud DD. Clinical preventive medicine in primary care: Background and practice: 1. Rationale and current preventive practices. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 165-172.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Hensrud DD. Clinical preventive medicine in primary care: Background and practice: 2. Delivering primary preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 255-264.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hensrud DD. Clinical preventive medicine in primary care: Background and practice: 3. Delivering preventive screening services. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 381-385.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Baker EL, Matte TP. Surveillance of occupational illness and injury. In: Halperin W, Baker EL, Monson RR, eds. Public health surveillance. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992, pp. 179-194.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kumar S. A conceptual model of overexertion, safety and risk of injury in occupational settings. Hum Factors 1994; 36(2): 197-209.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Drury CG, Broderick RL, Weidman CH, Reynolds Mozrall JL. A corporate-wide ergonomics programme: Implementation and evaluation. Ergonomics 1999; 42(1): 208-228.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Feuerstein M, Marshall L, Shaw WS, Burrel LM. Multicomponent intervention for work-related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2000; 10(1): 71-83.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Amik BC, Habek RV, Hunt A, Fossel AH, Chapin A, Keller RB, Katz JN. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000; 10(1): 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dasinger LK, Krause N, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42(3): 323-333.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Carayon P, Smith MJ, Haims MC. Work organization, job stress, and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Hum Factors 1999; 41(4): 644-663.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ayoub MA. Ergonomic deficiencies: I. Pain at work. J Occup Med 1990; 32(1): 52-57.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ayoub MA. Ergonomic deficiencies: II. Probable cause. J Occup Med 1990; 32(2): 131-136.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ayoub MA. Ergonomic deficiencies: III. Root causes and their correction. J Occup Med 1990; 32(5): 455-460.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Rosenstock L, Thacker SB. Toward a safe workplace: The role of systematic reviews. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18(4S): 4-5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amell, T., Kumar, S. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Design as a Prevention Strategy. A Review. J Occup Rehabil 11, 255–265 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013344508217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013344508217

Navigation