Elsevier

Surgery

Volume 119, Issue 3, March 1996, Pages 288-296
Surgery

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: Does sympathetic dysfunction originate from peripheral neuropathy?*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80115-2Get rights and content

Background. Sympathetic dysfunction in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) has been purported to consist of an afferently-induced increase in efferent sympathetic nerve impulses (somato-sympathetic reflex) and/or denervation-induced supersensitivity to catecholamines. In addition, both the central and peripheral nervous systems have been claimed to be involved. It was the aim of this study to obtain more insights into these underlying mechanisms.

Methods. In the affected extremities of 42 patients with RSD we investigated as indirect measures of sympathetic (dys)function: (1) skin blood flow and the vasoconstrictive response to dependency of skin microvessels by means of laser Doppler flowmetry (distal to the site of trauma), (2) relative distention of the brachial artery and changes in relative distention consequent to a cold pressor test by means of ultrasonic vessel wall tracking (proximal to the site of trauma), and (3) arterial blood pressures by means of the Finapres technique. Both provocation tests induce a sympathetically mediated response. Patients were divided into three categories according to their perception of skin temperature in their injured limb (stage I, stationary warmth sensation; stage II, intermittent warmth and cold sensation; or stage III, stationary cold sensation).

Results. Distal to the site of trauma, when compared with controls, skin blood flow was increased at stage I and decreased at stages II and III, whereas the vasoconstrictive response to dependency was impaired at all three stages. Proximally, when compared with controls, relative distention of the brachial artery and its response to the cold pressor test were decreased at all three stages. No differences were observed in pulse pressure between patient groups and controls.

Conclusions. These results suggest that sympathetic dysfunction in extremities of patients with RSD distal to the site of trauma consists of hypersensitivity to catecholamines at stages II and III as a result of autonomic denervation at stage I, whereas proximal to the site of trauma sympathetic nerve impulses may be increased at all three stages.

References (53)

  • MonsivaisJJ et al.

    The association of peripheral nerve compression and reflex sympathetic dystrophy

    J Hand Surg Br

    (1993)
  • GrundbergAB et al.

    Compression syndromes in reflex sympathetic dystrophy

    J Hand Surg Am

    (1991)
  • BennettGJ et al.

    A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man

    Pain

    (1988)
  • BasbaumAI et al.

    The spectrum of fiber loss in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat: an electron microscopic study

    Pain

    (1991)
  • ArnerS

    Intravenous phentolamine test: diagnostic and prognostic use in reflex sympathetic dystrophy

    Pain

    (1991)
  • BlumbergH et al.

    Neurologic aspects of clinical manifestations, pathophysiology and therapy of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (causalgia, Sudeck's disease)

    Nervenarzt

    (1991)
  • PrithviR et al.

    Skeletal trauma

  • BonicaJJ

    Causalgia and other reflex sympathetic dystrophies

    Postgrad Med

    (1973)
  • BeachamWS et al.

    Characteristics of a spinal sympathetic reflex

    J Physiol

    (1964)
  • MoeskerA et al.

    Treatment of postraumatic sympathetic dystrophy (Sudeck's atrophy) with guanethidine and ketanserin

    Pain Clinic

    (1985)
  • ArnoldJM et al.

    Increased venous alpha-adrenoceptor responsiveness in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy

    Ann Intern Med

    (1993)
  • DrummondPD et al.

    Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: the significance of differing plasma catecholamine concentrations in affected and unaffected limbs

    Brain

    (1991)
  • KurversHAJM et al.

    Reflex sympathetic dystrophy, result of autonomic denervation?

    Clin Sci

    (1994)
  • HassanAAK et al.

    Effect of indirect heating on the postural control of skin blood flow in the human foot

    Clin Sci

    (1986)
  • FagrellB

    The relationship between macro-and microcirculation clinical aspects

    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol Copenh

    (1986)
  • SmithJJ et al.

    Circulatory physiology: the essentials

    (1980)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Inflammation in CRPS: Role of the sympathetic supply

      2014, Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Paradoxically, though, norepinephrine levels were found to be lower in the affected than contralateral limb of CRPS patients (Drummond et al., 1991; Harden et al., 1994). Biopsies taken from people with chronic CRPS-1 suggest that this apparent paradox is most likely explained by increased density or responsiveness of alpha adrenoceptors in the skin (Kurvers et al., 1996; Drummond and Finch, 2004). Consistent with this, subcutaneous arteries from the affected side were less responsive to electrical stimulation, but showed a higher sensitivity to α1-adrenoceptor stimulation (Kurvers et al., 1998).

    • Complex regional pain syndrome: A comprehensive and critical review

      2014, Autoimmunity Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      At first glance this seems to argue against adrenergic supersensitivity due to decreased catecholamine concentrations. However, it actually accords with data showing that sympathetic hypofunction is confined to the distal portion of the affected extremity, whereas there is an increase of sympathetic outflow proximal to the site of the trauma that precipitated RSD, as evidenced by decreased relative brachial artery distention at baseline [112]. It is frequently argued that the increased sweat production observed in patients with CRPS must be centrally mediated because sweat glands do not develop denervation supersensitivity.

    • Autonomic nervous function assessment using thermal reactivity of microcirculation

      2000, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, during hyperventilation no changes in microcirculation can be measured (Steurer et al., 1995). The vasomotor response was achieved only on the fingers, but not on the volar forearm (Kurvers et al., 1996) and was suppressed by amitriptyline (Muck-Weymann and Rechlin, 1996). Another method uses severe and prolonged local cold to assess the changes on the cutaneous microcirculation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Supported by a grant from the Dutch Heart Foundation (NHS, D 89008).

    View full text