Table 1
StrengthsWeaknesses
  • ▸ Simple but novel design allowing tubing change without it being detached from the skin

  • ▸ Appealingly shaped (optimal aesthetic usability and contour bias)

  • ▸ Affords greater comfort and security for patients, encouraging mobilisation and promoting undisturbed sleep

  • ▸ Reduces cannula loss and therefore contributes to timely IV fluid and drug administration

  • ▸ Can be left on even after discharge home to fall off of its own accord, so reduces the risk of damaging delicate skin

  • ▸ Holds and directs tubing away from the skin rather than forcing it against the skin

  • ▸ Infection control guidelines easier to adhere to because administration tubing remains visible throughout its length

  • ▸ No exposed adhesive surfaces

  • ▸ Smooth curves prevent dust trapping

  • ▸ Skin reactions can be continually monitored through the transparent base

  • ▸ Economical manufacture from standard materials using a one-shot injection into a 2-part mould

  • ▸ Fine tolerance injection moulding is critical for optimal function

  • ▸ Clinical staff lack of familiarity with the device

  • ▸ No obvious marketing opportunities as brand reminder or service to medicine

  • ▸ Depends on each hospital deciding whether to allow staff access to it

  • ▸ Clinical staff familiarity with adhesive tape

  • ▸ Perception that tape is less expensive and ‘will do’

  • ▸ Expensive skin-safe adhesive required from a third party specialist

OpportunitiesThreats
  • ▸ The size of the crystalloid administration market in the UK and rest of the developed world

  • ▸ The possibility of making a range of products for tubing of different sizes

  • ▸ Resistance to change

  • ▸ Prior art and freedom to operate issues

  • ▸ Stringent economic climate

  • ▸ Demand for clinical trial data before cost saving can be claimed